--- description: Review of Awardify Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice New Zealand. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Awardify | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice NZ --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Competition Software](/directory/4689/contest/software) > [Awardify](/software/504486/Awardify) # Awardify Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/504486/Awardify Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/504486/Awardify?page=2) > Awardify is a software program designed to simplify and organize the award show process. It caters to organizations, associations, and event planners who need a comprehensive solution to manage their award programs. The software offers an intuitive interface, mobile-friendly capabilities, and tools for online payments, judging, and evaluation. Awardify is designed to be flexible and customizable, allowing organizations to tailor the software to their specific needs and branding. The platform streamlines the entire award management process, from initial setup to final award presentation. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 23 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 23 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Aspen Films - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: CA$1,979.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate - **Pricing Details**: $1,979 per year - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Activity Dashboard - Awards Management - Commenting/Notes - Customisable Branding - Customisable Forms - Customisable Questions - Customisable Templates - Customizable Fields - Data Import/Export - Electronic Payments - Electronic Submission - Email Reminders - Entrant Management - Entry Fee Processing - Entry Management - Forms Management - Judging Management - Landing Pages/Web Forms - Polls/Voting - Progress Tracking ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - Phone Support ## Category - [Competition Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4689/contest/software) ## Alternatives 1. [OpenWater](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/144613/openwater) — 4.6/5 (73 reviews) 2. [Award Force](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/125758/award-force) — 4.8/5 (193 reviews) 3. [Zealous](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/338464/zealous) — 4.7/5 (53 reviews) 4. [Woorise](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/473758/Woorise) — 4.7/5 (58 reviews) 5. [ShortStack](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/166909/shortstack) — 4.4/5 (156 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Great Awards Management Software\!" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *2 June 2022* | Marketing & Advertising | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: It is customizable, user-friendly and provides great value > > **Cons**: No specific cons come to mind at the moment ----- ### "Saskatoon Chamber's SABEX Awards" — 4.0/5 > **Treena** | *18 November 2025* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: The platform is very user friendly from an administrator, judge and applicant. I enjoy that it is customizable. The tech support and assistance has been very valuable and greatly appreciated right from the start. > > **Cons**: Sometimes it is a bit tricky adding logos to certain pages. I would also recommend when making edits to the to either have the info automatically saved or move the SAVE button to the top of the page. > > Awardify has been a great tool to ensure that we provide an authentic adjudication process. The feedback has been positive for those using the application form as well. ----- ### "A Powerful, User-Friendly Solution Backed by Exceptional Support" — 5.0/5 > **Ellie** | *9 April 2026* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: User-Friendly Interface: The platform is intuitive for both administrators and submitters, making it easy to navigate through submissions, edits, and uploads. Customizable \& Flexible: Awardify allows us to tailor categories, questions, and workflows to fit the unique structure of the GOHBA Housing Design Awards, which is a huge advantage. Seamless Online Judging: The judging process is efficient and fully online, allowing judges from across Canada to participate easily while maintaining fairness and consistency. Data Management: Tracking entries, managing submissions, and exporting information is reliable and organized, critical for a program of our size. Continuous Improvements: The platform is always evolving, with updates and enhancements that show they are listening to client feedback. Exceptional Customer Support: \[sensitive content hidden\], our customer representatives, has been absolutely amazing. They are incredibly responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive in helping us find solutions. Their support has truly elevated our experience with Awardify. > > **Cons**: Limited Flexibility in Certain Reports: Some reports (particularly around user information and submission requirements) feel slightly rigid and could benefit from more customization or simplification. Minor User Experience Gaps: At times, the user journey for submitters could be streamlined further to reduce confusion, especially for first-time users. Backend Adjustments Can Take Time: While support is excellent, some requested changes or customizations are not always immediate and may require additional turnaround time. > > Overall, our experience with Awardify has been extremely positive. The platform has significantly streamlined our awards process and allowed us to manage a large-scale program with confidence and efficiency. While there are a few areas that could be improved, they are minor compared to the overall value the system provides. With the continued support of \[sensitive content hidden\], and ongoing platform enhancements, Awardify remains a key partner in the success of our awards program. ----- ### "Pretty meh, it'll do the job I guess." — 3.0/5 > **Mayla** | *27 August 2025* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like that it's canadian-based, and it's fairly easy to reach the staff. The landing page looks good. > > **Cons**: Unintuitive navigation, poor stop-checks, difficult to navigate through the nomination-submission-judging process. > > This is my second year using the software, and I've made recommendations to ease the flow and use of the software, but nothing has changed. They just told me today that there is no work around the 'approvals' I need to do, I have over 200 entries that I need to go into one-by-one and select approve on... It's adding unnecessary hours of work. The menus on the dashboard are also a mess, and unintuitive. They list a whole page of supposed 5 star reviews on their website, but I wanted to make sure folks knew they're a bit of a mess to work with. ----- ### "Outstanding Customer Service" — 5.0/5 > **Liza** | *28 February 2026* | Marketing & Advertising | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: For the price, Awardify delivered on the most important needs for our awards competition, including automation for submissions, judge sign-ups, scoring, and winner determination. When we needed support or something extra, \[sensitive content hidden\] were highly, highly responsive and accommodating. We were incredibly impressed. > > **Cons**: The interface/UX could use improvement, and it didn't allow us to award a first, second, and third — only first. > > I would use them again and advise others looking for awards software in this price range to do the same. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/504486/Awardify?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/504486/Awardify) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data