--- description: Review of CheckProof Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice New Zealand. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: CheckProof | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice NZ --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Preventive Maintenance Software](/directory/395/preventive-maintenance-software/software) > [CheckProof](/software/474688/CheckProof) # CheckProof Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/474688/CheckProof Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/474688/CheckProof?page=2) > CheckProof offers a comprehensive set of key features designed to streamline maintenance and HSEQ management for the Construction Materials and Heavy industries. By digitizing maintenance routines, the Maintenance Management feature enhances asset availability and performance, ensuring optimal operational efficiency. Additionally, the Health and Safety Compliance feature prioritizes worker safety and equipment compliance, providing a secure environment for personnel and assets. With Smarter Quality Control, users can leverage a digital toolkit to streamline quality processes and deliver exceptional final products. Checklists and Audits simplifies frontline inspections through customized digital checklists, while Incident and Case Management enables smarter reporting of accidents and safety observations. Users can swiftly create and capture defects using the Deviation Reporting feature, facilitating quick and efficient resolution of issues. Focusing on enhancing productivity and optimizing outputs, CheckProof includes features like Production Management, which effectively increases productivity and reduces downtime. Fleet Optimization utilizes gamification techniques to optimize mixed fleets, thereby reducing idle time and minimizing fuel costs and CO2 emissions. Additionally, the Resource and Planning tool ensures effective resource allocation for asset maintenance by centralizing task and team member management across various sites. RFID Tag Scanning minimizes shortcuts and guarantees task completion by requiring relevant machinery RFID tag scans before marking tasks as done. Facilitating seamless communication, the platform ensures timely information delivery to the right individuals through a single digital platform. Additionally, API and Integrations enable users to connect their fleet and existing systems to CheckProof for real-time data monitoring, offering comprehensive insights into assets and operations. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 23 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 23 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: CheckProof ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$29.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: From 18 USD. - **Target Audience**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: Arabic, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Ukrainian - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 208 more ## Features - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Notifications - Appointment Management - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Barcode/Ticket Scanning - Barcoding/RFID - Calendar Management - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Management - Contract/License Management - Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA) - Customisable Forms - Customisable Reports - Customisable Templates - Data Capture and Transfer - Data Import/Export ## Integrations (2 total) - OSOS ERP - Telematics Exchange ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Preventive Maintenance Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/395/preventive-maintenance-software/software) ## Related Categories - [Preventive Maintenance Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/395/preventive-maintenance-software/software) - [CMMS Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/441/web-based/software) - [Equipment Maintenance Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/405/equipment-maintenance/software) - [OEE Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/3691/oee/software) - [Maintenance Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4390/cmms/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Fracttal One](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/413016/fracttal) — 4.6/5 (1773 reviews) 2. [MaintainX](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/116409/maintainx) — 4.8/5 (1025 reviews) 3. [Limble](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/34626/limblecmms) — 4.8/5 (752 reviews) 4. [eMaint CMMS](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/1926/emaint-x3) — 4.4/5 (388 reviews) 5. [Maintenance Connection](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/1781/maintenance-connection-facilities-management) — 4.4/5 (443 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Easy to operate for an end user" — 4.0/5 > **Jay** | *8 April 2026* | Civil Engineering | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The app for the end user is easy to use and can be tailored to suit the needs of the company easily. > > **Cons**: The initial set up was a headache but with Checkproofs help made much easier. \[sensitive content hidden\] helped enormously to get things set up for us. > > As an admin and a user one of the easiest maintenance managers going, a little more user adjustability would be nice but overall easy to work with. ----- ### "Integral To Site Operations" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *16 April 2026* | Mining & Metals | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Ease of use – simple, intuitive, quick team adoption Maintenance management – proactive planning, reduced downtime Task scheduling – clear visibility, accountability, nothing missed Reporting deviations – easy logging, strong audit trail, improved safety Customer support – responsive, knowledgeable, reliable Continuous improvement – developers act on feedback and regularly enhance the system Real-time visibility – better control of daily operations Efficiency gains – streamlines processes and saves time > > **Cons**: Dependence on user input – system is only as good as the data entered Integration gaps – may not seamlessly link with all existing systems > > CheckProof has been a fantastic addition to our operations. The ease of use makes it simple for the whole team to adopt, even for those less confident with digital systems. The platform stands out in maintenance management, helping us stay organised and proactive. The task scheduling feature keeps everything on track, ensuring nothing gets missed, while reporting deviations is quick and straightforward, improving accountability across the board. Checkproofs customer support is excellent—responsive, helpful, and always willing to go the extra mile - Shoutout to \[sensitive content hidden\] What really sets CheckProof apart is their development team. They are continually working to improve the system and genuinely take on board customer feedback, regularly implementing suggestions that make a real difference to day-to-day use. Overall, a reliable and forward-thinking system that has genuinely improved how we manage our daily operations. ----- ### "Breedon Admin Review." — 4.0/5 > **Ross** | *28 April 2026* | Building Materials | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: From my perspective, CheckProof aligns well with a governance-driven inspection model. The structure—sites, users, templates, scheduling, execution, and review—fits naturally with how we’re trying to standardise processes. The hierarchy is clear, and the audit trail is strong, giving visibility on who completed inspections, when they were done, and what was flagged. That supports compliance and consistency across multiple sites without needing to build a system from scratch. It has also helped reduce variation between sites. In our environment, different locations tend to develop their own ways of working, so having a consistent set of templates, frequencies, and outputs is valuable. It limits the drift you typically get with paper-based or loosely managed systems. The usability is another strong point. The interface is simple, mobile-friendly, and doesn’t require technical expertise, which is critical in a quarry environment. In practice, that means inspections are more likely to be completed properly rather than just recorded as done. Where it works best for us is as a data capture tool. It handles the necessity of inspections well with its workflow—capture, defect identification, and review—effectively, and can feed into a wider system landscape if used that way. > > **Cons**: The main issue I’ve encountered is the rigidity of the system. Making changes to structure—whether that’s site setup, templates, or naming conventions—is far more difficult than expected. Once things are set up, they are not easy to adapt, which becomes a problem when trying to refine or improve the system over time. This has been particularly challenging when merging data from two companies. There is no easy way to map or restructure data when merging systems. Aligning data from different sources requires manual work rather than being handled within the platform. The lack of access to our data within CheckProof is also a limitation. We can export certain information, but not everything, which restricts how we use the data outside the platform. There are also issues with some admin controls. Selector buttons for enabling or disabling features or permissions do not always behave as expected—for example, a setting can be switched on but not actually activate. In some cases, this appears to be due to the CheckProof side not being fully enabled, which can create confusion. While not a major issue and typically resolved with support, it is worth noting. > > Overall, CheckProof is good at what it’s built for—capturing inspections and standardising activity across sites. The challenge comes when you need flexibility. If your structure is already set, it works well. If you’re trying to merge systems or refine how things are set up, it becomes harder to work with and more manual than expected. ----- ### "Driving Accountability and Reliability Through Structured Inspections" — 5.0/5 > **Scott** | *8 April 2026* | Mining & Metals | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: CheckProof has been a really effective tool for driving accountability and visibility across site. The ability to raise, track and close out deviations in real time has helped highlight recurring reliability and safety issues that would otherwise get missed or delayed. It’s particularly useful for linking checks directly to actions, meaning the team can clearly see what needs doing and why. From a management perspective, it gives a clear overview of where problems are coming from (by unit/area), which supports better decision-making and prioritisation. It’s also a strong tool for reinforcing standards – especially when used properly with structured inspections and follow-ups. > > **Cons**: The system is only as strong as the discipline of the users. If checks aren’t completed properly or deviations lack detail, it can reduce the effectiveness of the data. Some areas of the interface could be more streamlined, particularly when reviewing large numbers of deviations or trying to extract trends quickly. There is also a reliance on consistent setup (rounds, standards, descriptions), which takes time to get right initially. Without that, reporting can become unclear. > > Overall, CheckProof has been a valuable tool for improving site standards, reliability, and communication. It supports a more structured way of working by linking inspections directly to actions and ensuring nothing gets lost. On our site, it has helped highlight repeat failures, improve follow-up on maintenance issues, and create clearer accountability across the team. When used properly, it becomes a key part of daily management rather than just a reporting tool. It works best when there is strong leadership driving its use, clear expectations on what “good” looks like, and regular review of the data to focus on what actually impacts production and safety. ----- ### "Great experience switching to digital with CheckProof" — 5.0/5 > **Alice** | *13 April 2026* | Mining & Metals | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The app is extremely easy to set up and use, with a wide range of options for capturing all HSEQ and maintenance tasks, as well as checklists. It provides excellent visibility for teams across our site, helping to streamline operations and improve accountability. The support from the CheckProof team has also been outstanding. > > **Cons**: There have been a few glitches but nothing the team haven't resolved in a good timeframe. Overall a great positive experience so nothing more negative to raise. > > A great experience overall, and it continues to be so. The support is consistently available, and the initial setup isn’t something you have to handle alone—the team provides substantial assistance every step of the way. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/474688/CheckProof?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/474688/CheckProof) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data