Sigrid
All Sigrid Reviews Apply filters
Browse Sigrid Reviews
All Sigrid Reviews Apply filters
This service may contain translations provided by google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. Gartner's use of this provider is for operational purposes and does not constitute an endorsement of its products or services.
- Industry: Government Administration
- Company size: 1,001–5,000 Employees
- Used Monthly for 1-5 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
Still exploring
I am a new user. Our company just enrolled Sigrid, and I am still exploring the website.
Pros
Nice overview of the software quality of all the applications within our company.
Cons
I am still a new user, so I didn't find anything negative yet.
- Industry: Computer Software
- Company size: 11–50 Employees
- Used Daily for 6-12 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
A Vital Resource for Strategic Software Management
Pros
In the nutshell, providing constant insights into the health of our software systems was delivered by Sigrid. With extensive coverage for more than 300 technologies, detailed source code analytics, and a quality and productivity boost, it worked wonders for our code.
Cons
Sigrid's user interface can sometimes be a bit unintuitive, mostly when moving around several features within the product. Just a minor glitch, this can disrupt the user experience for a moment.
- Industry: Political Organisation
- Company size: 51–200 Employees
- Used Monthly for 1+ year
-
Review Source
Show more details
Highly unsatisfying experience with code quality monitoring software
Pros
Some quality aspects are monitorable, even though not all the essential ones
Cons
Customizability of what is measured and how this works with architecture goals is very low.
Immediate feedback for developers missing
Response from Software Improvement Group
Dear Jesper,
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback regarding our platform. We genuinely appreciate your insights as they are crucial for our continuous improvement.
Our team is constantly working to enhance our software's capabilities and ensure it aligns more closely with the diverse needs of different users.
We are committed to delivering a product that not only meets but exceeds your expectations. If you're open to it, we would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss your experience in more detail. This could help us understand your specific needs and preferences better, allowing us to address them more effectively in future updates.
Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/. Your continued satisfaction is our top priority, and we are here to support you.
Thank you once again for your review. We look forward to the opportunity to improve your experience with our software.
- Industry: Publishing
- Company size: 5,001–10,000 Employees
- Used Weekly for 6-12 months
-
Review Source
Show more details
Keeping a good eye on Open Source and Low Code software development efforts
Although getting pseude code for all low code diagrams from our Mendix app made me a bit skeptical in the beginning, I started to appreciate the overall features Sigrid provides and the ability to review both Open Source and Mendix low code apps. As I outlined in the cons, there should be more credit/focus in Mendix Low Code developed apps when as little Java as possible is used, benefitting fully from Low Code assesments. I personally don't appreciate when Java is seen as the way to go in Low Code software development.
Pros
We use Sigrid for the following objectives (in order of top prio first):
- Monitor and avoid vulnerabilities in libraries we use
- Assess and improve code & low code quality
- Assess Software Architectures and avoid/minimize module entanglements
- Benchmark our Open Source and Low Code developments
- Focus on good enough development and not over engineer
Cons
- In the Architecture Overview of your App, the Scores for Technology Stack give you 2.8 stars for all developments you do in Mendix Low Code (and we use Mendix QSM, the Mendix version of Sigrid) and 5.4 stars for any Java code you use in your Mendix app, this is crazy and should be solved. In a Mendix app you should expect the opposite, 2.8 stars if you use Java instead of the Low code way of developing. If this can be improved, Sigrid is a great tool.
Response from Software Improvement Group
Dear Rob,
Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid.
We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
- Industry: Computer Software
- Company size: 51–200 Employees
- Used Weekly for 1+ year
-
Review Source
Show more details
Good product to improve quality for developers and architects
Pros
Sigrid provides actionable points of improvement, and you can track improvement well in time.
Cons
It tends to forget your preferences you select on overview pages, which makes it a bit annoying when you navigate back and forth. The Code explorer could be made more user friendly.
Response from Software Improvement Group
Dear Guido,
Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid.
We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
- 1
- 2