--- description: Review of Ideagen Quality Control Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice New Zealand. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Ideagen Quality Control | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice NZ --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Product Lifecycle Management Software](/directory/444/product-lifecycle-management/software) > [Ideagen Quality Control](/software/419756/Ideagen-Quality-Control) # Ideagen Quality Control Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/419756/Ideagen-Quality-Control Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/419756/Ideagen-Quality-Control?page=2) > Q Pulse PM is a process management, and product lifecycle management quality assurance software designed for manufacturing industries with features including visual mistake-proofing for information that is missing or out-of-tolerance results, automatic population of forms, inspection form templates, non-conformance report generation, electronic signatures and more. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 58 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 58 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Ideagen - **Founded**: 1993 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Per Feature (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Forms Automation - Process Modeling & Designing - Product Data Management - Project Management - Quality Management - Rules-Based Workflow - Supplier Management - Templates ## Category - [Product Lifecycle Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/444/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Product Lifecycle Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/444/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [Business Process Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4351/bpm/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Zapier](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/163639/zapier) — 4.7/5 (3069 reviews) 2. [Lucidchart](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/88975/lucidchart) — 4.5/5 (2261 reviews) 3. [Visio](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/410111/visio) — 4.5/5 (3283 reviews) 4. [Albato](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/362860/albato) — 4.8/5 (406 reviews) 5. [process.science](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/253277/process-science) — 4.8/5 (106 reviews) ## Reviews ### "It does make a difference" — 5.0/5 > **Paul** | *21 September 2020* | Aviation & Aerospace | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The software allows for an easy time bubbling and collecting data. It makes all the difference for the way you represent your drawings. > > **Cons**: It seems to have trouble reading older drawings. I also feel that it is so simple that it can not ever do more > > I use it on a daily but wish I still have opportunities to try other software ----- ### "Q pluse Fair software" — 5.0/5 > **Tracey** | *10 October 2024* | Aviation & Aerospace | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to create Fairs and navigate around the software. > > **Cons**: OCR can be glitchy sometimes but can be worked around. > > Made creating fairs much smother and quicker experience. ----- ### "Ideagen Quality Control Review" — 2.0/5 > **Robin** | *19 July 2024* | Mechanical or Industrial Engineering | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like that the modules integrate between the FAIR, Control Plan, PFMEA etc. > > **Cons**: I don't like that when you fill out data the screen jumps around, you can't copy/paste (which wastes time), the PFMEA is cumbersome and doesn't work as well as I would like, and the templates are not customizable by the user - we have to pay extra every time a customer changes a document that the template outputs too. > > Customer service is very responsive, but not very good at actually solving issues that we have submitted. ----- ### "very good to use within the organization" — 5.0/5 > **Manjunath** | *16 September 2024* | Defense & Space | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: easy to use \& user friendly for ballooning the drawings. > > **Cons**: sometime unable to search some folders which is stored in sever > > its really use full \& easy to use for ballooning the drawings. ----- ### "Quality Engineer who uses Action Management, Audit, Calibration & Documents modules on a daily basis" — 4.0/5 > **Ricky** | *7 May 2024* | Airlines/Aviation | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: The design and subsequent layout is very user friendly, I personally I like that the different modules all have their own search boxes so that your Clipboard and "Mental Clipboard" don't have to keep numbers in them, they can be dumped in each module and referred back to in the future. I also find the search function across all modules to be very helpful considering the amount of records that my company has created. > > **Cons**: I find the Audit module to be difficult to follow in regards to how the months are displayed visually, only the 12 months of the year are visible when the module opens. It has been my experience across various companies and corresponding industries that annaul Audits for example, are often performed after their scheduled date and would therefore not be visible, as an improvement I would reccomend expanding this to include the 3 months both proceeding \& following the scheduled Audit month. I don't believe this would drastically effect the overall layout of the module window as currently there is a "dead space" between the ending of even our longest worded Audit Title until the 12 calendar months are shown. If it would not be too development and/or CPU intensive I would recommend an algorithim be implemented in to the search function of the Calibration module specifically that includes in the search results potential spelling errors within the Number, as again in my experience, many spelling mistakes are made on calibration labels/mis-interpretations of their spelling \& numbering. For example the Number 053 may be written on a calibration sticker but be mis-interpreted as 058, 038, 088 etc when inputting on to Q-Pulse meaning it will not show up in the results when someone searches for what they have read on the sticker. ----- Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/419756/Ideagen-Quality-Control?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/419756/Ideagen-Quality-Control) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data