--- description: Review of QA Wolf Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice New Zealand. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: QA Wolf | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice NZ --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Load Testing Software](/directory/4634/load-testing/software) > [QA Wolf](/software/370367/qa-wolf) # QA Wolf Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/370367/qa-wolf Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/370367/qa-wolf?page=2) > QA Wolf is a simple, fast, and free end-to-end testing tool, fully optimized for the entire team. With QA Wolf, users can create tests right in their browser and collaborate with their team in real-time. Testers can invite team members to their testing dashboard, share links to tests, and collaborate on test creation and maintenance. QA Wolf generates Javascript code while users browse, making it intuitive and simple for anyone to create and run tests on Netlify or Vercel deployments, which can be run in parallel. Test results are received in minutes, regardless of the number of tests running, and can be pushed to teams in their inbox or in Slack. • Re-run specific lines of code. Don't re-run an entire test when you only need to fix a few lines of code. With QA Wolf, you can re-run only the code you're troubleshooting. • Document failures with logs \& videos. Understand and reproduce failures fast by using recorded videos, logs, and highlighted lines of code where the test failed. • Re-run and fix tests directly in your browser. With QA Wolf there's no need to run code locally or wait for a CI build. QA Wolf enables you to fix and maintain tests right in your browser. > > Verdict: Rated **5.0/5** by 68 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **5.0/5** | 68 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 100% | (10/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: QA Wolf - **Location**: seattle, US ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$0.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based - **Target Audience**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Canada, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - API - Action-Word Testing - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Notifications - Bug Tracking - Bug/Issue Capture - Collaboration Tools - Customisable Reports - Data Import/Export - Data Visualisation - Monitoring - Move & Copy - Parameterised Testing - Quality Assurance - Real-Time Analytics - Real-Time Data - Real-Time Reporting - Regression Testing - Reporting & Statistics ## Integrations (3 total) - Netlify - Slack - Vercel ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) ## Category - [Load Testing Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4634/load-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Load Testing Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4634/load-testing/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4316/performance-testing/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4651/user-testing/software) - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4187/automation-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) ## Alternatives 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/200650/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/41699/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 3. [ACCELQ](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/228334/accelq) — 4.9/5 (130 reviews) 4. [Katalon Studio](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/321525/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 5. [Mailinator](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/263160/mailinator) — 4.7/5 (146 reviews) ## Reviews ### "QA Wolf Automation Excellence" — 5.0/5 > **Jacqueline** | *14 May 2025* | Machinery | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Frees up our QA test time by running automated nightly regression tests, integrating with our tools and providing results in my company's communication channels. > > **Cons**: Any automation can be even faster. We have 150 tests that run for just under an hour. Of course, part of the time limitation is the tool under test and connection. > > Their customer service is excellent. I feel supported by a team and they explain their process, help drive initiatives and communicate regularly. The test runs are consistent with easy to review results. They are always willing to tune the automation so it is the best it can be for us. ----- ### "Excellent Collaboration and Adaptability" — 5.0/5 > **Sunny** | *14 September 2025* | Telecommunications | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: They are very responsive to our needs both in communication and in deliverables. They spend time understanding our requirements and follow-up regulary on what's working and what needs improving. It's easy to communicate our requirements and updates with them as they are willing to take input in many modalities. They are quick to report issues that are found in testing and they collaborate actively in managing the bugs as well as test assets. > > **Cons**: That's hard to say as they adapt quickly to any of our inputs. Whenver we come across an area of imrpovement we can share with them in our regular catch-up's and it gets address. > > QAWolf have worked as collaborators with us on our test automation project. They were quick to understand the domaini and adapted quickly to our input on their first deliverables. They are also very flexible on the way we can provide requirements and feedback which makes it easy for us. They have provided value in the way that they have managed their role in the release test cycle. ----- ### "Advanced QA Automation" — 5.0/5 > **John** | *16 September 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The tool QA Wolf has built to handle all things QA is advanced and user friendly. It is nice to be able to see our test suite, coverage, runs, timing, etc.. all in one place. We also really appreciate how responsive their team is. We have a slack channel with our account rep and a couple of their engineers and a message in there never goes more than a couple minutes without a response, even on nights and weekends. > > **Cons**: It is not super easy to get them a mobile build to be tested. I think this is somewhere they could improve a little. > > Overall we are pretty happy with our experience with QA Wolf. They have helped up expedite our QA cycles by automating what was once a bunch of QA engineers manually testing things over and over again. This saves money and time. We are happy. ----- ### "A Reliable Partner for Test Automation Success" — 5.0/5 > **Aleida** | *7 October 2025* | Information Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: It’s not just a tool — it’s a full team behind it. The QA Wolf team truly partners with us to automate our tests efficiently. They’ve significantly reduced our team’s workload, and thanks to them, everyone now trusts the automated tests. QA Wolf helps us catch errors early and prevent issues from reaching production. > > **Cons**: There isn’t really anything negative to say. Since it’s a collaborative process, it takes coordination between both teams, but QA Wolf does an excellent job keeping all test cases up to date and aligned with our changes. > > Our overall experience has been outstanding. QA Wolf has become an extension of our team, helping us improve our testing coverage, reliability, and confidence in every release. Their proactive communication and dedication make them a valuable partner we can always rely on. ----- ### "What I expected from a premium service. We'll keep using them\!" — 5.0/5 > **Malachi** | *15 November 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Three things: 1. They take ownership of the tasks they're given. If something feels or appears wrong, even if it's not something explicitly discussed or outlined, they'll take the time to reach out and clarify that the features they're testing are working as intended. 2. Staying on top of the tests themselves and fixing them if they break. 3. We get to own the tests that were written if/when we decide to part ways > > **Cons**: What’s considered a “test” that gets charged for is smaller than what I would normally intuit. This is something I expected coming into this service. And ultimately, I understand the approach from their perspective. Nonetheless, I’m occasionally taken aback when I pitch something as three or four tests. But then they come back and say, “No, we need to break this up into ten tests”. > > We had a large pile of tests that we were doing manually once a month. We were slowly automating them one by one, but we just didn't have the man-power to do such quickly while keeping up with everything else. We were able to hand off the entire list to QA-Wolf, and they automated all the tests with surprisingly minimal oversight and time from me within a few months ----- Page: 1 / 4\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/370367/qa-wolf?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/370367/qa-wolf) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data