--- description: Review of DeepSource Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice New Zealand. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: DeepSource | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice NZ --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Source Code Management Software](/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) > [DeepSource](/software/235303/deepsource) # DeepSource Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/235303/deepsource Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/235303/deepsource?page=2) > DeepSource is the code health solution, providing organizations with everything they need to build maintainable and secure software while elevating the velocity of their software development cycle. Most organizations use many tools cobbled together to improve the quality and security of their code base. DeepSource is an all-in-one alternative to all those products and a replacement for all manual tooling for code health organizations have built in their CI pipeline. Developers and security engineers are empowered to discover and fix maintainability and security problems in the codebase during the earliest stages of software development. Here is how teams benefit from DeepSource: - One-click integration with all major version control systems - Continuous analysis on every commit - Accurate and fast analyzers (guaranteed below 5% false-positive rate) - Automated remediation of issues with Autofix™️ - Automated code style formatting - Integrated code coverage tracking - Code maintainability and security reporting - Self-hosted version with one-click installation and upgrades > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 10 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 10 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: DeepSource - **Founded**: 1 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$8.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Linux (On-Premise) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 210 more ## Features - Application Security - Bug Tracking - Bug/Issue Capture - Change Management - Code Repository Integration - Code Review - Continuous Integration - Dashboard - Debugging - For Developers - Integrated Development Environment - Issue Management - Issue Tracking - Multi-Language Scanning - Multiple Programming Languages Supported - Real-Time Analytics - Reporting/Analytics - Repository Management - Security Testing - Source-Code Scanning ## Integrations (4 total) - Bitbucket - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Chat ## Category - [Source Code Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Source Code Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) - [Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4429/sast/software) ## Alternatives 1. [SonarQube](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/182719/sonarqube) — 4.5/5 (66 reviews) 2. [Jsmon](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/528998/Jsmon) — 4.8/5 (5 reviews) 3. [GitHub](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/397820/github) — 4.8/5 (6155 reviews) 4. [Aikido Security](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/433685/aikido) — 4.7/5 (6 reviews) 5. [GitLab](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/28004/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1215 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Pros and Cons of DeepSource: My Personal Review" — 5.0/5 > **Reunaldo** | *27 February 2023* | Marketing & Advertising | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: DeepSource's ease of use and comprehensive code analysis impressed me. I also liked how simple the setup process was, as well as the comprehensive dashboard, which allows me to easily track the progress of my codebase. Furthermore, the ability to customize the rules for code analysis and track code quality trends over time was a huge plus. Overall, DeepSource has been an excellent tool for assisting us in quickly identifying and resolving potential coding issues. > > **Cons**: The least appealing aspect of DeepSource is that the free plan does not include any automated analysis. You would have to manually review all of the pull requests and issues. ----- ### "How good is DeepSource for code" — 5.0/5 > **Adrian** | *1 May 2020* | Industrial Automation | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: The feature of automatic linkage with the GitHub repositories is very useful and time saving, I also like that the linkage remains. Code's analysis is very complete and specific, pointing to the exact line with the issue. And It also can resolve them automatically with is also time saving and I learn from them. > > **Cons**: I would like that the issues would be reflected in GitHub, so I can resolved manually if I like. > > It very easy to use, and useful for improving code quality and save time. ----- ### "DeepSource Review" — 4.0/5 > **Marek** | *15 May 2023* | Financial Services | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: One of the things I liked most about DeepSource was its powerful code analysis capabilities. It provided comprehensive and detailed feedback on potential code issues, including code smells, security vulnerabilities, and best practice violations. The ability to catch these issues early on and improve code quality was highly valuable. Additionally, DeepSource's seamless integration with popular code repositories made it easy to incorporate into my development workflow. > > **Cons**: While DeepSource had many aspects, one thing I liked least was the occasional false positives generated by the code analysis. There were instances where it flagged certain code segments as problematic when, in reality, they were not. This required additional time and effort to manually review and verify the reported issues. Although DeepSource continuously improved its analysis engine, reducing false positives further would enhance the overall experience. > > Its robust code analysis capabilities significantly contributed to improving code quality and maintainability. The seamless integration with my development workflow made it easy to adopt and incorporate into my projects. While there were occasional false positives, the benefits of catching potential issues early on outweighed this minor inconvenience. DeepSource proved to be a valuable tool in my code review and quality assurance process. ----- ### "DeepSource analyzes, improves code quality and keeps our codebase clean" — 5.0/5 > **Anirudh** | *10 August 2021* | Internet | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: We have been using DeepSource for six months now. I can see the difference in the code style and the code quality of the files that have gone through DeepSource and not gone through DeepSource. There's a clear difference in the way indentation happens or the number of whitespaces that are left, or the number of columns that are present in the code. If you compare, if you take the difference between these two files there will definitely appear a difference between the files that have been processed through DeepSource and the files that have not been processed. > > **Cons**: We would like to see the support added for multiple files for the Autofix feature. > > Most of the time, developers miss out on formatting their code in the local development environment, and having DeepSource integrated removes the headache of manually going through the code and seeing if there are any accidental linting or formatting errors that developers might've left in their code. So it just does the job automatically for us. ----- ### "The strength of DeepSource its capacity to offer thorough feedback on the security and code quality." — 5.0/5 > **Sanket** | *1 March 2023* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The tool's smooth integration with well-known code repositories like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket makes it simple to integrate it into current processes. It can also be integrated with well-known code editors like PyCharm, IntelliJ IDEA, and VS Code. Moreover, DeepSource provides customization possibilities so that teams can adapt the tool to their own requirements. For instance, they can set the severity levels of various concerns or configure the programme to disregard particular issues. > > **Cons**: One potential drawback is that it could generate a lot of input, which some engineers might find overwhelming. It can take a lot of time and effort to prioritise problems after going through all the input.The tool's potential for producing false positives or failing to detect all problems is another potential downside. > > Overall, DeepSource is a great solution for teams looking to increase the security and quality of their code. It is simple to use, effortlessly incorporates with current procedures, and offers thorough feedback on code errors. Teams that wish to produce better code and steer clear of future costly blunders should give it some serious thought. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/235303/deepsource?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/235303/deepsource) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data