--- description: Review of BrowserStack Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice New Zealand. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: BrowserStack | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice NZ --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Bug Tracking Software](/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/200650/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/200650/browserstack Page: 1 / 31\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale, and optimize testing. BrowserStack is used by teams and organizations of all sizes - whether testing manually, starting test automation, or scaling automation. Over 50,000 customers, including Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web \& mobile apps. We help them: - Expand test coverage with cross-browser, real device, accessibility, and visual testing. - Scale test automation with BrowserStack's leading cross-browser \& real device cloud and test observability. - Centralise and scale testing processes with test management. - Unlock testing \& quality insights. Our Products: Live - Manual cross-browser testing App Live - Manual real-device testing Automate - Browser automation grid App Automate - Real device automation cloud Percy - Automated visual testing and review Low code automation - Test automation without coding Accessibility Testing - Test WCAG and ADA compliance Test Management - Unify and track all test cases Test Observability - Test debugging \& insights > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 749 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 749 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$39.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - A/B Testing - AI/Machine Learning - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Action-Word Testing - Activity Dashboard - Activity Monitoring - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Escalation - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Approval Workflow - Archiving & Retention - Assessment Management - Asset Discovery - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) ## Related Categories - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4187/automation-testing/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4316/performance-testing/software) - [Observability Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4534/observability/software) - [Compliance Software](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/directory/4363/compliance/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/144529/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [QA Wolf](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/370367/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (68 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/76542/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 4. [Lightster](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/440012/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/429510/testomat-io) — 4.8/5 (22 reviews) ## Reviews ### "essential tool for cross browser testing" — 5.0/5 > **YOUSSEF** | *24 March 2026* | Computer & Network Security | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: the ease of use is amazing you can just log in and start testing on almost any device immediately it really helps with productivity improvement since we do not have to manage physical devices test management and automation are also very straightforward to integrate > > **Cons**: value for money could be better for individuals or small startups since the plans get expensive quickly also sometimes customer support is a bit slow to reply when you have a complex technical issue > > using browserstack has been a game changer for testing it makes finding bugs across different browsers so much easier and faster overall it is a very solid tool that does exactly what it promises and saves tons of development time ----- ### "Good Coverage for Browser and Device Testing in One Platform" — 5.0/5 > **Rajnikant** | *13 March 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: One of the things I like most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser and cross-device testing without needing to maintain a physical device lab. As a Technical Project Manager, it really helps our team speed up QA cycles because developers and testers can quickly check how features behave on different browsers and operating systems in real time. The platform is reliable and the device coverage is impressive, which is useful when managing projects that need to support multiple environments. I also appreciate how smoothly it integrates into our CI/CD pipeline, allowing automated tests to run as part of our release process. Overall, it saves a lot of time and helps us catch compatibility issues early before they reach production. > > **Cons**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency, especially during peak usage times. Occasionally, some live testing sessions can feel a bit slow or take time to start, which can interrupt the testing flow for the team. Another challenge is the pricing structure, which can become expensive as the team grows or when you need access to more parallel sessions and devices. For smaller teams or projects with tight budgets, this can be something to consider. That said, while these issues come up from time to time, the overall functionality and convenience of the platform still make it a valuable tool for managing cross-browser testing. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. As a Technical Project Manager, it has helped streamline our testing process and made it much easier for the team to validate features across different browsers and devices without maintaining our own infrastructure. It’s particularly helpful during release cycles when we need quick feedback from QA and developers working in parallel. The platform is straightforward to use, and the ability to run both manual and automated tests has improved our testing efficiency. While there are occasional performance delays and the pricing can be a bit on the higher side, the convenience, device coverage, and reliability generally outweigh those concerns for our team. ----- ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing Tool with Minor Performance Delays" — 3.0/5 > **Poornima** | *28 October 2025* | Research | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The interface is very intuitive and user-friendly. Setting up tests and switching between different devices or browsers was smooth, which helped save a lot of time during regression cycles. > > **Cons**: While the platform is powerful, I experienced delays and lag on certain devices and browsers, which affected the smoothness of real-time testing. Optimizing performance speed would make the experience even better. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack was good. It made cross-browser and cross-device testing convenient, though occasional delays affected performance at times. ----- ### "A Reliable Platform for Easy Cross-Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Chetan** | *16 March 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easy it makes cross-browser and cross-device testing. Instead of installing and managing multiple browsers or physical devices locally, I can quickly test my web applications on different operating systems, browsers, and real mobile devices directly from the platform. This saves a lot of setup time and makes the overall testing process much more efficient. Another thing I appreciate is the availability of real devices in the cloud. It helps identify UI and responsiveness issues that sometimes don’t appear in local environments. The platform is also quite easy to use, and starting a testing session or switching between devices is smooth. Overall, it simplifies the testing workflow and helps ensure better compatibility across different environments. > > **Cons**: One thing I noticed is that sometimes the sessions can feel a bit slow, especially when connecting to certain devices or browsers. There can be a slight delay while interacting with the remote device, which can affect the testing speed when you are quickly checking multiple scenarios. Another small drawback is that the pricing can feel a bit high for smaller teams or individual developers. Also, occasionally there can be queue times when trying to access popular devices. Overall, these issues are not major, but improving performance consistency and pricing flexibility would make the experience even better. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been really smooth and helpful during the development and testing process. It gives quick access to a wide range of browsers and real devices, which makes it much easier to verify how applications behave in different environments without setting up everything locally. What I like most is how convenient it is to reproduce and debug browser-specific issues. Instead of guessing how something might look or work on another device, I can simply open a session and test it directly. This has saved a lot of time during development, especially when checking UI responsiveness and compatibility. Overall, it has become a reliable tool in my workflow for ensuring that applications run consistently across different browsers and devices. ----- ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing That Boosts Productivity" — 5.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *25 March 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing incredibly easy without needing to maintain physical devices or complex setups. The platform supports a wide range of real devices and browsers, which is very useful for ensuring compatibility. I particularly liked the automation capabilities (Selenium, Cypress, etc.) and how smoothly they integrate into CI/CD pipelines. The UI is intuitive, and live testing is fast and responsive. It significantly improves productivity by reducing the time spent on manual testing setups. > > **Cons**: Occasionally, there can be slight latency during live sessions on certain devices. Test session limits and concurrency restrictions in lower plans can also be a constraint. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It’s a reliable and powerful platform for both manual and automated testing across multiple environments. It has streamlined our QA process, improved release confidence, and saved significant infrastructure costs. While the pricing could be more flexible, the value it delivers in terms of ease of use, test coverage, and productivity makes it a worthwhile investment. ----- Page: 1 / 31\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.co.nz/software/200650/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Structured Data